|
The wait is over. The results of the much-awaited DQ Channels Satisfaction
Survey are finally out. The surprises were unlimited with people who made it
last time, slipping from their ranks this year. IBM was the Channel Champion
this year, while HP slipped to second position winning the Silver award. It was
house of glory for IBM who walked away with Gold award in almost all categories.
IBM dominated the whole channel satisfaction survey, while the other awardees
were HP, Seagate and HCL.
The results were completely different from those announced last year. IBM,
which did not find any place last year (while Lenovo was there), won awards in
almost all the categories this time. Lenovo, Cisco and APC were completely
washed out in the award categories. HP managed
to gain four Silver medals, while HCL bagged three. But, HCL was the only
company to displace IBM in one of the categories-Best Relationship Management.
Seagate won a Silver medal under Best Product Quality.
HP was runner-up in three places (excluding the channel champion category),
Best Brand Image, Best Marketing Support and Best Online Support. HCL stood in
Best After-Sales Support and Best Commercial Terms. IBM won Gold everywhere,
except for Best Relationship Management where it bagged the Silver award.
 |
The Survey
Commissioned in 2001, DQ Channels-IDC Channel Satisfaction Survey has
entered its seventh year. The main objective of carrying out the survey is to
find which vendor is the favorite among channels and for what reasons. The
survey has both macro and micro objectives. Macro objectives include-to identify
the top technology vendors that channel partners are most satisfied with and to
find out the channels choice for best brands in the market, across various
product categories covering hardware, software and services. The micro
objectives are-to identify attributes that the channel community reckons as the
most important factor for satisfaction and to determine the channel satisfaction
across key criteria with concerning vendor. The survey results would definitely
help vendors to know where they stand in the market and focus on the pain areas
to improve their service and position in the market. IDC conducts this survey,
supported by a thorough scientific approach, for the accuracy of results and
final outcome. IDC brings to the fore its strength and expertise in the survey,
with meticulous planning of the whole exercise.
 |
Channels Satisfaction Measurement
IDC used the IT-Reseller Satisfaction Measurement Model to arrive at the
deliverables proposed. The model lends more accuracy to the results of
satisfaction measurement by factoring in the importance that respondents attach
to each criterion used for evaluation. Since most channel surveys require
maintaining brand quotas in order to ensure thorough coverage of the population,
there could be possibilities of bias in sampling.
Channel Choice Awards for Different Product Categories
For each product within a category, respondents were asked to name the vendor,
who in their opinion is the best. Further, the respondents were asked to
substantiate their opinion by choosing one strong reason from a list of five
reasons. Given the broad spectrum of products and services covered under the
survey, the choice of reasons was kept generic deliberately so as not to make
them product-specific.
Sampling and Cities Covered
The survey was carried out in 18 key cities across the country, with a given
sample size. This year, the survey base was increased to 861 from last years
807. Raipur, Guwahati and Nagpur are the new cities added into the list, while
Goa, Jammu and Ludhiana were removed. Sample size for each city almost remained
the same like last year. The total sample had a right mix of distributors,
retailers, corporate resellers, system integrators/value-added resellers and
traditional resellers in it.
Channel Satisfaction Survey was done for a wide range of products covering
various leading brands in the market. Though, many popular brands figured in the
list, only the top 13 brands were considered for further evaluation, based on
the points they scored. The 13 brands include IBM, HP, HCL, Lenovo, Seagate, LG,
Samsung, D-Link, Acer, TVS-E, Epson, Intel and Canon.
The overall satisfaction level (industry average) stood at 76 percent,
on a sample base of 860 respondents. Only four companies out of the 13
considered for evaluation under various attributes scored above the industry
average of 76 percent. IBM, HP, HCL and Lenovo individual scores stood at 80.4
percent, 78.3 percent, 77.7 percent and 76.6 percent respectively.
Similarly, in the individual attributes such as product quality, after-sales
support, brand image, marketing support, commercial terms, relationship
management and online support, only four to seven companies scored higher than
the industry average, in their respective sections.
Page(s) 1 2 3
|